I was a little underwhelmed by rvm, but then, I don't have a great need for 10 flavors of Ruby.
I definitely found its not an ideal solution for a production server deployment. Its far more suitable on your development machine. I had some fun with rvm trying out some benchmarking of 1.8 vs 1.9 vs. jruby and it did the job there. I'm still a 1.8.7 die-hard, but I suspect rvm will become much more useful when I finally start making the switch to 1.9. I've actually tried making the switch to 1.9 a couple times, but couldn't get all projects and gems ported successfully (AND maintained because the gem authors weren't heavily supporting 1.9 themselves and not taking my patches, either!) on every platform (Ubuntu, CentOS, Windows, and Macs). All those native extension gems were a deal killer at the time. Michael On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Scott LaBounty <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone use rvm? Is it worth the effort? I got it installed, but it > seems like quite a bit of bother for what I need at least. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Scott > http://steamcode.blogspot.com/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sequel-talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en. > -- http://codeconnoisseur.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
