RVM + Homebrew changed my life and re-grew my hair! No seriously, the combination is awesome.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Michael Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I griped about that one in one of the IRC channels...turns out > there's a rubygems_snapshot gem that will package up the gems in one > rvm space and then you can roll them all out in another after > switching. > > > Michael > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Scott LaBounty <[email protected]> wrote: >> Part of my problem was that after I loaded it, all my gems "disappeared". >> Actually they're only >> good on the "system" ruby. So ... I'd have to reinstall all of them. I'm >> not sure, for the amount of development I do, that it's at all worth doing >> that. Like you said, if I had multiple ruby versions that I needed to test >> (e.g. as gem developer) then it might seem pretty cool. >> >> Thanks you both, >> >> Scott >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Michael Lang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I was a little underwhelmed by rvm, but then, I don't have a great >>> need for 10 flavors of Ruby. >>> >>> I definitely found its not an ideal solution for a production server >>> deployment. Its far more suitable on your development machine. I had >>> some fun with rvm trying out some benchmarking of 1.8 vs 1.9 vs. jruby >>> and it did the job there. >>> >>> I'm still a 1.8.7 die-hard, but I suspect rvm will become much more >>> useful when I finally start making the switch to 1.9. I've actually >>> tried making the switch to 1.9 a couple times, but couldn't get all >>> projects and gems ported successfully (AND maintained because the gem >>> authors weren't heavily supporting 1.9 themselves and not taking my >>> patches, either!) on every platform (Ubuntu, CentOS, Windows, and >>> Macs). All those native extension gems were a deal killer at the >>> time. >>> >>> Michael >>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Scott LaBounty <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Does anyone use rvm? Is it worth the effort? I got it installed, but it >>> > seems like quite a bit of bother for what I need at least. >>> > >>> > Thoughts? >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Scott >>> > http://steamcode.blogspot.com/ >>> > >>> > -- >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> > Groups >>> > "sequel-talk" group. >>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > [email protected]. >>> > For more options, visit this group at >>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en. >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://codeconnoisseur.org >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "sequel-talk" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Scott >> http://steamcode.blogspot.com/ >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "sequel-talk" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > http://codeconnoisseur.org > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sequel-talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
