Speaking personally, when I'm in this discussion group, I'm thinking about code and am consurrently in the sequel repository. Consequently, I think github discussions would simplify matters and would prefer that.
*O**nly* if the history was imported. Without that, I wouldn't want to transition. I checked and it doesn't look like they have an import API *yet*. <https://github.com/github/feedback/discussions/36> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 8:54:28 PM UTC-8 Jeremy Evans wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 7:00 PM [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm indifferent. I hate the idea of having another medium to search for >> historical conversations over (there's a wealth of great advice you and >> others have given in this group over the years), but Discussions has a few >> more niceties: syntax highlighting, tags, marking as answered are 3 that >> I'd enjoy utilizing. >> >> If the switch happened, any idea what would happen to this group? Can it >> be archived and preserved? >> > > I can see about importing all conversations from the Google Group if we > decide to switch. This is similar to when we switched to GitHub Issues, > where all existing issues from Google Code were imported into GitHub > Issues. GitHub probably has an API that supports importing into > Discussions, but I'm less sure about Google Groups. However, Google Groups > has been around much longer, so there probably is something that supports > it. > > Thanks, > Jeremy > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sequel-talk/7cdba939-b026-4f2a-b48d-ebdf8a3ffea3n%40googlegroups.com.
