Ioana Danes wrote [10/05/2006 04:53 PM]:
Hi Damian and Olivier,
Unfortunately enforcing strict table-level locking is
not a solution for us. In this scenario and the TPS
dropped from 122 to 18, which is unacceptable...
There might be an option to devise a solution to your problem. This
would imply hacking the code and using the fearful 'priority-inversion'
device. We could, may be, come up with a quick fix that would schedule
things in the order you (righteously) expect without breaking the rest.
You will have to wait for the Architect to return though. Give us a bit
of time to see what can be done about this.
Thank you,
Ioana
Thank you for your time !
A+O.
_______________________________________________
Sequoia mailing list
[email protected]
https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
