Hello Everyone,

Do you have any news regarding this issue?

Thank you,
Ioana

--- Olivier Fambon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Ioana Danes wrote [10/05/2006 04:53 PM]:
> > Hi Damian and Olivier,
> > 
> > Unfortunately enforcing strict table-level locking
> is
> > not a solution for us. In this scenario and the
> TPS
> > dropped from 122 to 18, which is unacceptable... 
> > 
> 
> There might be an option to devise a solution to
> your problem. This 
> would imply hacking the code and using the fearful
> 'priority-inversion' 
> device. We could, may be, come up with a quick fix
> that would schedule 
> things in the order you (righteously) expect without
> breaking the rest.
> 
> You will have to wait for the Architect to return
> though. Give us a bit 
> of time to see what can be done about this.
> 
> > Thank you,
> > Ioana
> 
> Thank you for your time !
> 
> 
> A+O.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sequoia mailing list
> [email protected]
>
https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

_______________________________________________
Sequoia mailing list
[email protected]
https://forge.continuent.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoia

Reply via email to