On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 09:16 +0100, Danny Angus wrote: > > > Wouldn't we need to switch to maven to get away with > > something like this? > > We could use maven, if we wanted to. +1
I've moved a lot of my work projects and pet projects to Maven and can't see myself ever going back to Ant. One of my biggest frustrations with working on James has been updating my Eclipse classpath to reflect the changing dependencies. With Maven I can just do "maven eclipse" and I'm done. I think this kind of simplicity could help attract more developers to James. I know I'm more likely to dig into an open-source project if they're using Maven because I know it's going to be easy to get things up and running. -Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
