Ahmed Mohombe wrote:
I think this could be a big improvement for performance and reduce the
memory footprint
Do you have and approximate numbers about the possible gain?
It is difficult to give an estimate: totally depends on specific
configurations/messages.
Performance improvements are mainly provided by less memory usage (and
GC usage) and by avoiding loading the message more times.
I (like many other users) would be much more happy with IMAP, config
reload without restarting JAMES, a better "Virtual Host"
support(something that just works), etc., but this is still sounds
fantastic IMHO.
I'm sorry but I personally don't need IMAP/Virtual host/dynamic
reloading so I prefer to spend my spare time improving things I use.
BTW I know that if we provide a better product we increase the
possibilities to find new developers committed in new improvements, so
I'm also working on the "virtual host" support.
I would also be glad to *help* on IMAP or other features but currently
there is no one working on it and I don't want to be mantainer for code
I don't even use.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
