Or, with calendars, maybe not. Maybe the calendar functions are supported only by the client and are sent to a separate calendar server. The more I think about it, the more I think that you're right, Berned.

Address book, though, I'd still like to push a little on. The same argument still applies, but I still feel, what's e-mail without an address book? If it doesn't belong in its own server, where does it belong?

Thom Hehl wrote:
Thanks for the point to IETF. I have subscribed to iCalendar list and will work from their baseline to see how it works. I did not succeed in finding Address Book functionality, though. If it's there, please let me know. If not, I'll see if I can get one started.

I think that address book maintenance is VITAL to any mail application. Mail simply isn't that useful without it. I feel that this would be an important addition to JAMES. I would be interested in other opinions on this.

Calendar functions have always been integrated in mail applications and you need e-mail to send out invitations to a meeting. While technically, this does not belong in a mail client, you mail-client has to hand off to a calendar server and you still have to build this in, so why not build in the calendar function? JAMES already supports 4 protocols. I would be interested in hearing other thoughts about this.

Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to