Or, with calendars, maybe not. Maybe the calendar functions are
supported only by the client and are sent to a separate calendar server.
The more I think about it, the more I think that you're right, Berned.
Address book, though, I'd still like to push a little on. The same
argument still applies, but I still feel, what's e-mail without an
address book? If it doesn't belong in its own server, where does it belong?
Thom Hehl wrote:
Thanks for the point to IETF. I have subscribed to iCalendar list and
will work from their baseline to see how it works. I did not succeed
in finding Address Book functionality, though. If it's there, please
let me know. If not, I'll see if I can get one started.
I think that address book maintenance is VITAL to any mail
application. Mail simply isn't that useful without it. I feel that
this would be an important addition to JAMES. I would be interested in
other opinions on this.
Calendar functions have always been integrated in mail applications
and you need e-mail to send out invitations to a meeting. While
technically, this does not belong in a mail client, you mail-client
has to hand off to a calendar server and you still have to build this
in, so why not build in the calendar function? JAMES already supports
4 protocols. I would be interested in hearing other thoughts about this.
Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]