Same here. We use maven2 for the jspf subproject and im really happy with it. if we can get sure maven2 can manage all needs i would be +1 for it.
bye Norman Am Donnerstag, den 25.05.2006, 09:35 +0100 schrieb Danny Angus: > I use james at work and it is a very good way of controlling project > structure, (src, docs, tests, everything), I would be +1 to maven if a > POC demonstrated that it meets all of our requirements. > > d. > > On 25/05/06, Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +0. I use ant for everything still. The one thing I see Maven as > > able to do better is generate a site layout better... which is > > appealing since our website generation is pretty influx/messed up now, > > and we do have lots of subprojects that could use their own mini site > > in a consistent layout. > > > > Not sure it really helps us with versioning docs generation, but > > anyway, those are my 2 cents. > > > > -- > > Serge Knystautas > > Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com > > p. 301.656.5501 > > e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:1,44756e1237021843541276!
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
