We should continue to make sure James is running with Java versions > 1.4 And I am +1 for a future version of the mailet engine to require Java 5. About requiring Java 5 for the Server, I don't know. Why should the Server require Java 5 if it really does not use any J5 specifics and only one of its subprojects does? If the mailet engine was pluggable and a J1.4 compatibility release was available, it would not be such a big shift.
Bernd On 1/8/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A discussion on the Mailet-api list about annotations has started to look at the possibility of requiring java 5 for James. WDYT? I would be cautiously in favour of this as long as no-one knows of any real situations where 1.4 is the newest available version. depending on whether this proposal achieves a clear consensus I may call a vote. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
