On 1/20/07, Jürgen Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<snip>
> we should backport noel's fixes even if there design is less than > elegant. we should fix every startup script that we can in case any > calls have been missed even though this is an unmaintainable solution. > we should write clearly in the release notes that JAMES may be > effected by a known issue with some Sun JVMs causing memory leaks and > note the fix for those running in other environments. all this should > be done on the release branch. So you are suggesting to do both? What is the benefit of doing both?
take a release branch and commit both on that branch only. together they cover more use cases than either alone.
> but on trunk, we should implement the best medium term solution. this > means implementing noel's fixes in a more elegant fashion. I think it was pointed out, that Noels fixes broke some serious design considerations. I think the 2 parties should come together and work on a new solution, which is suitable for everyone.
+1 but IMO it's expedient to patch the release branch so that a release can be cut without the bug - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
