Embeding james in databases is not as silly as you seem to think, Dan Debruner proposed embeding james in derby a couple of years ago. Admins want to run the products they know, and as little else as possible.
On 2/6/08, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bernd Fondermann wrote: > > > > - The Web container is the wrong container > > One has to get used to it. ;-) > > Oh, please, I spend more time in the web container than you do awake. :-p > > Still doesn't make the web container the right place to embed a fairly heavy > mail server, as opposed to providing a connection from things running in the > Web container to a mail server running elsewhere. > > > > - We should be doing OSGi, not Spring > > +0 for starting a pure OSGi deployment. This is such a massive task, I > > probably have no time to take a major role there. But I will try to > > help where I can. > > Robert's idea of talking with the Felix folks in April makes sense. > > > > - None of this has anything to do with improving JAMES for mainstream > use > > We will see. Tomcat and Jetty are in mainstream use. > > Yes, for Web apps. Hey, why not embed JAMES inside of Oracle and DB2, too? > They're in mainstream use. > > > As I reported recently, the phoenix-deployment is currently broken caused > > by JMS configuration issues. > > Well, it would be nice if whomever broke it, fixed it. > > --- Noel > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
