On Feb 9, 2008 7:09 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2008 3:20 PM, Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 8, 2008 3:17 AM, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Feb 7, 2008 12:14 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > That's generally down to laziness, not good architecture.
> > >
> > > I don't think its fair to characterize the perfectly reasonable desire
> > > to minimise  the admin overhead of systems, and the size of the skills
> > > base required as "laziness", it is in fact a strategy with reduces
> > > both cost and risk.
> >
> > IMHO the primary goal of 21st century software development is laziness
> > maximization.  For example, I will gladly spend an extra $99 for 2GB
> > more RAM per server in a 5 node cluster over having my developers
> > spend 1-2 days optimizing memory usage in their code.
> >
> > When I'm expecting my cluster to have 100 servers, then I can
> > cost-justify having someone like Noel come in and tell me how to
> > architect my system better so I don't have to spend $10,000+ on RAM,
> > or how to do the same traffic with 50 servers.  In the meantime I'll
> > gladly take options that expand my flexibility and help me get by.
>
> :-)
>
> given a good web admin application, a completely embedded solution
> (JAMES+DERBY in WAR)  would be a good match for the SMBs targetted by
> Apache OFBiz

anyone know if anyone from OFBiz is going to be at the hackathon?

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to