Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
I wasn't referring to the obvious intent, I was referring to the fact that
there are commits to each branch that are not present in the other.
Sorry, sometimes (most times) what is obvious for me isn't obvious for
you and viceversa ;-)
So your
suggestion to:
"svn cp v2.3 next-minor"
would lose commits in next-minor that are not present in the v2.3 branch.
Nevermind. I'll continue to review diffs.
--- Noel
This is what happened between 2.3.0 and next-minor
493999 8-gen-2007 10.43.28 2 norman Rename v2.3 branch to
next-minor
- 488141 18-dic-2006 7.56.42 1 norman Add comment for
mail.smtp.localhost option. See JAMES-735
- 488138 18-dic-2006 7.51.21 2 norman Revert fix i commited for heloname
usage in RemoteDelivery. This fix is not needed cause its possible to
set the heloname with
<mail.smtp.localhost>some.host.name</mail.smtp.localhost> . Backport
needed changes from trunk. (Thx Stefano for reporting). See JAMES-735
- 487546 15-dic-2006 14.09.39 2 norman Backport fix for
JAMES-735.
- 475204 15-nov-2006 12.20.56 8 bago Fixed a bunch of broken links on
the new website (JAMES-691)
470929 3-nov-2006 19.01.35 5 noel JAMES-592. Trunk has a more involved
fix (doesn't use a static method), but the call stack would be the same.
We use dnsjava for host name resolution, rather than populating the
InetAddress cache.
I think that in v2.3 all but r470929 was merged
494041 8-gen-2007 13.20.55 8 norman Copy xml files from next-minor to
2.3 branch for backport previous commits r469117 and r475204
494056 8-gen-2007 14.15.03 2 norman Merge fix for JAMES-735
r470929 is the famous patch voted down for v2.3, I'm sure you remember.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
