On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:

<snip>

> > 2. it uses mailet-api-3.0-SNAPSHOT. i would prefer to use the last
> > mailet release.
> >
>
>  +1
>  Furthermore IIRC current mailet-api trunk is really similar to mailet 2.3.
> So maybe a mailet-api 2.3.1 (should be backward compatible) should be made,
> too, before moving to 3.0-SNAPSHOT.

+0

i'm willing to support such as release but i'm not sure when i'll be
able to find the cycles to push it forward...

> > 3. i would like to think about creating a baseline release for this
> > component. what needs to be done?
> >
>
>  We need to update our crypto notice/export stuff. We previously declared
> only JAMES-Server 2.3.1 in the ASF pages.

yes (there are some more details to be taken care of as well)

IMHO it would be better not to ship the crypto-mailets with 3.0
releases but to allow users to download the jar if they want to use
the crypto stuff.

> > 4. i would like to merge in the work from the cryptography branch. i
> > think that it might be best to tidy up trunk first then create a 1.0
> > branch then merge in changes from the branch.
> >
>
>  What is the "cryptography branch" ?

the development area for Vincenzo and myself to work on OpenPGP, there
has been some interest lately in completing this implementation. it
should be *much* easier to work on this now that crypto-mailets is a
separate project.

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to