Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
IMHO it would be better not to ship the crypto-mailets with 3.0
releases but to allow users to download the jar if they want to use
the crypto stuff.
Why? we'll need the crypto/export stuff for james server anyway because of
the SSL support in the protocols, don't we?
ATM only the SMIME mailets are included in the notification
IIRC java does not contain strong crypt out-of-the-box so i'm not sure
whether a notification is needed
In this case I agree it makes sense to not ship crypto-mailets by default.
PS: Should we keep the org.apache.james.security.openpgp package or is it
better to replace "james" with "mailet" ?
not sure: this is a wider area for discussion
ATM most of the mailets are packaged under org.apache.james. repacking
them would be logical but would break compatibility.
True. Let's keep "james".
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
