Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
IMHO it would be better not to ship the crypto-mailets with 3.0
releases but to allow users to download the jar if they want to use
the crypto stuff.
Why? we'll need the crypto/export stuff for james server anyway because
of the SSL support in the protocols, don't we?
4. i would like to merge in the work from the cryptography branch. i
think that it might be best to tidy up trunk first then create a 1.0
branch then merge in changes from the branch.
What is the "cryptography branch" ?
the development area for Vincenzo and myself to work on OpenPGP, there
has been some interest lately in completing this implementation. it
should be *much* easier to work on this now that crypto-mailets is a
separate project.
james/server/sandbox/rfc3156 !
Sorry, I totally forgot about it, and the "crypted" name didn't help
refreshing my memory when I rarely looked at our sandboxes ;-)
+1 for merging that code
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=494577) to mailet-crypto.
PS: Should we keep the org.apache.james.security.openpgp package or is
it better to replace "james" with "mailet" ?
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
