On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We had a number of recent messages (2 related to spring, 2 related to imap) > about people trying to build sandboxes or branches code for things we > already merged to trunk. > > I think we should clean up our sandbox/branches stuff so to make it clear > what is outdated and what still have an use. > > For branches I propose to move from > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/branches/ > to > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/branches/old/ > The following branches: > - branch_2_1_fcs > - imap-dev > - java_apache > - v2-0a2candidate1 > - v2-1-pop3file
+1 > For sandboxes instead I'm not able to understand the status for each one, so > this is what I propose, feel free to give better suggestions. > > I would create an "inactive" folder and a "merged" folder. > > I propose to move from: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/sandbox/ > to: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/sandbox/merged > the following sandboxes: > - james-jcr > - spring-integration > - seda-imap-modular +1 or just delete them > and to move from > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/sandbox/ > to: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/sandbox/inactive > everything else. > AFAIK we have no "active" branches ATM. +1 > Doubts (because I don't know their status) > "design-doodles": maybe this should be left in the main folder as it is > recent. it's just a way to distribute UML > "imap-functional": don't know if this is merged, active, old or what. think it's merged > Everything else seems to be more than 1 year old. > > opinions? fine by me - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
