Niklas Therning wrote:
Hi,
I've done some benchmarking of the recent performance improvements in
trunk vs Mime4j 0.3. I must say that the result is very promising! :)
I did my tests on about 130000 messages, most of them less than 10 kB
in size. All message files had been cached by the Linux file cache
when I conducted the tests so it doesn't take the disk I/O in
consideration. I guess I should also run the tests without the cache
but I don't know how to force it to flush. The test uses the SAX-like
parser interface and a ContentHandler which does nothing (only
consumes the data).
...
As you can see 0.4 is about twice as fast on messages less than 10 kB
in size and about 10 times faster for messages larger than 100 kB.
That is quite amazing!
Please let me know if my benchmarking method is flawed in any way. I'm
attaching the source code of the test tool.
Niklas,
I was getting similar results with my tests (up to 9 times faster
parsing of large messages)
Cheers,
Oleg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
