On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niklas Therning ha scritto: >> >> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: >>> >>> Stefano Bagnara wrote: >>>> >>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >>>>> >>>>> what else needs to be done before we can ship? >>>> >>>> I'm looking here: >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel >>>> >>>> I see 4 issues open for the 0.4 release: >>>> >>>> MIME4J-57 Add a max limit to header length for parsing. >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-57 >>>> - this seems critical because it may results in OOM/DoS, but we had this >>>> in past too, so could even be moved to 0.5. >>>> >>>> MIME4J-69 Decoding/encoding is not coherent between headers and body >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-69 >>>> - this probably is too complicate to delay a release and I don't have >>>> the evergy to discuss how it should be correctly solved, now. So if no one >>>> plan to work on it soon, it should be moved to 0.5. >>>> >>>> MIME4J-51 Remove cyclic dependencies and provide better organization of >>>> the source tree. >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-51 >>>> - I applied my proposed patch. There are concerns from you and Bernd >>>> 1) remove also the util package. >>>> 2) add a package documentation with examples and "parser" references. >>>> I personally don't care of #1, and if needed I can work on #2 but >>>> without examples, simply adding a package.html with one single sentence: >>>> "the main classes for the pull and SAX parser are in the parser package." >>>> >>>> MIME4J-27 [JW#7] Limitations Support >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-27 >>>> - No answers from Jochen to your question in a month. maybe it should be >>>> moved to 0.5. >>>> >>>> Once the 4 issues above have been solved (or postponed) we need a >>>> release manager. >>>> >>>> Nothing else I can remember now. >>>> >>> >>> Stefano, >>> >>> None of these issues seems severe enough to block the 0.4 release. I >>> would very much appreciate if the 0.4 release could happen rather sooner >>> than later. It would be very unfortunate if we had to release HttpClient >>> 4.0-beta1 without the HttpMime module. >>> >>> Oleg >> >> I agree with Oleg. IMO these issues can be moved to 0.5. >> >> /Niklas > > Just to make it clear that I agree with you two, too. I simply dumped the > JIRA status and told that I had nothing against moving every open issue to > 0.5.
+1 - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
