Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niklas Therning ha scritto:
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
what else needs to be done before we can ship?
I'm looking here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
I see 4 issues open for the 0.4 release:
MIME4J-57 Add a max limit to header length for parsing.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-57
- this seems critical because it may results in OOM/DoS, but we had this
in past too, so could even be moved to 0.5.
MIME4J-69 Decoding/encoding is not coherent between headers and body
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-69
- this probably is too complicate to delay a release and I don't have
the evergy to discuss how it should be correctly solved, now. So if no one
plan to work on it soon, it should be moved to 0.5.
MIME4J-51 Remove cyclic dependencies and provide better organization of
the source tree.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-51
- I applied my proposed patch. There are concerns from you and Bernd
1) remove also the util package.
2) add a package documentation with examples and "parser" references.
I personally don't care of #1, and if needed I can work on #2 but
without examples, simply adding a package.html with one single sentence:
"the main classes for the pull and SAX parser are in the parser package."
MIME4J-27 [JW#7] Limitations Support
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-27
- No answers from Jochen to your question in a month. maybe it should be
moved to 0.5.
Once the 4 issues above have been solved (or postponed) we need a
release manager.
Nothing else I can remember now.
Stefano,
None of these issues seems severe enough to block the 0.4 release. I
would very much appreciate if the 0.4 release could happen rather sooner
than later. It would be very unfortunate if we had to release HttpClient
4.0-beta1 without the HttpMime module.
Oleg
I agree with Oleg. IMO these issues can be moved to 0.5.
/Niklas
Just to make it clear that I agree with you two, too. I simply dumped the
JIRA status and told that I had nothing against moving every open issue to
0.5.
+1
I moved 3 issues to 0.5. Left MIME4J-51 in 0.4 because I think we may
have consensus really soon on this, but I'd like to repeat that if a
release manager is found and he wants to release today (unlikely) I can
take care of reverting MIME4J-51 and move it to 0.5 so he will be ready
to go.
We all hope that Robert after a first warm-up jSieve release will flood
us with release votes for mime4j and mailet* :-)
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
