On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Demetrios Kyriakis <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Just out of curiosity: is JAMES server dead? >>>> >>>> not really >>>> >>>> the 2.x code base is now mature with active development continuing on >>>> the more advanced 3.0 codebase (eg >>>> http://www.ohloh.net/p/apache-james/analyses/latest) >>> >>> I see lots of "refactorings", but not sure about actual functionality for >>> the user >>> itself in the *last year*. If I recall right, one year ago the most >>> important functionalities( simple virtual hosting, and add hosts without >>> restart) were already there. >> >> IMAP now works > > Where can a *user* download it and try it from (and how)?
grab a nightly build, unpack and use the start script > Also this sounds like very very big news (considering that it is the missing > 'E' from JAMES). > Doesn't it deserves some front page announcement? I mean the JAMES website > is so hard to update? If yes, a blog on blogspot takes 5 minutes to register > - and be able to communicate such important info like this) i've played that particular game before with other projects, and i understand how long it takes me to do it right. (other people may well be quicker but prose takes me a long time to write.) i'm personally not very interested in generating publicity or trying to grab more users ATM. if other people are interested in this then cool: submit a patch and i'll gladly review it. if the documentation on building the site isn't clear, all you have to do is ask. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
