[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17140426#comment-17140426
]
Ioan Eugen Stan commented on JAMES-2510:
----------------------------------------
I've linked the Reorganize issue as I think as you [~matthieu] they are related.
The group ID's will come after we decide the structure and what we deliver
which we might have a clear view once we do the gradle migration (or not)
It's a bit of a tangle but we'll pull through it.
We should avoid taking too much on our plate at once to avid chaos.
Let's discuss what we commit and in what order during the community call
[~btellier] proposed.
> use a consistent artifact naming scheme
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-2510
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2510
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Build System
> Affects Versions: 3.1.0
> Reporter: Matthieu Baechler
> Priority: Major
>
> Maven modules have different naming scheme, for example :
> * apache-james-*
> * james-server-*
> * protocols-*
> it makes everything hard to read and to find and it's redundant because
> groupId already gives context about an artifact.
> I'll make a proposal to reduce the noise in our maven files.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
