> you could clone the repo, change the plugin version to a custom
> version, change references to scala 2.12 to scala 2.13 and run an install
> locally

Yes, I did. I forked this plugin and manual change scala version on local.
As I wrote
> "I got another issue: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
scala.reflect.internal.util.ReusableInstance, scala/collection/IterableOnce"
Maybe need more time to check.

Thank you,

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 6:34 PM Jean Helou <jean.he...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is my configuration
> >
>
> looks good to me, so it looks like the plugin is indeed pinned on scala
> 2.12, you could clone the repo, change the plugin version to a custom
> version, change references to scala 2.12 to scala 2.13 and run an install
> locally to check that having the plugin itself compiled against 2.13 works.
> if it does you can chime in on the PR to try and get it merged in an
> official manner.
> What I usually do in such cases is publish an unofficial version of the
> tool on an unofficial repo and use that until the PR is merged. not sure
> how that flies for apache projects though especially since the plugin uses
> a BSD3 license.
> Since it's not a published artifact of the project maybe we are allowed to
> do that as long as we publish the custom build to a public repo ? I used to
> publish on bintray not sure where to go now ..
>
> Regards,
> Jean
>
>
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:21 PM Jean Helou <jean.he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Tung,
> > >
> > >
> > > > Very interesting with the rewrite feature of the scalafix tool.
> > > > I tried it for the `jmap-rfc-8621` module. I got an incompatible
> issue
> > > with
> > > > the scala version when trying Semantic Rules.
> > > >
> > >
> > > According to the issue you link to, the plugin only works with scala
> 2.12
> > > and according to the error message you report, the james code base uses
> > > scala 2.13.
> > > In this case it won't work unless the plugin is cross compiled for
> 2.13.
> > > What's intriguing is that the tips and tricks section [1] has a sample
> > > configuration for the semantic db compiler  which seems ot hint that
> the
> > > scala.version can be configured. but i actually doubt it would work
> > >
> > > can you share the configuration you used ?
> > > [1] https://github.com/evis/scalafix-maven-plugin#tips-and-tricks
> > >
> > > I don't use the maven plugin itself, all my scala projects use either
> SBT
> > > or mill so I don't have this layer of issues.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jean
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/evis/scalafix-maven-plugin/pull/12
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Tung
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 2:44 PM Jean Helou <jean.he...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi tung,
> > > > >
> > > > > Have you looked at scalafix[1]? it seems to be much more actively
> > > > > maintained than scalastyle and I feel that it's scope overlaps
> > > > scalatyle's
> > > > > quite a bit...
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]https://github.com/scalacenter/scalafix
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > jean
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 8:14 AM tungtv...@gmail.com <
> > > tungtv...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello guys,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I realize the current checkstyle.xml file doesn't support the
> Scala
> > > > > > convention.
> > > > > > Should we have a checkstyle for that?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My suggestion:
> > > > > > - https://github.com/scalastyle/scalastyle
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - https://github.com/scalastyle/scalastyle-maven-plugin
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tung, Van TRAN
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Tung, Tran Van
> > > > *Phone:* (+84) 35 757 6258
> > > > *Skype:* tung.tv202
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tung, Tran Van
> > *Phone:* (+84) 35 757 6258
> > *Skype:* tung.tv202
> >
>


-- 
Tung, Tran Van
*Phone:* (+84) 35 757 6258
*Skype:* tung.tv202

Reply via email to