> I have a pull request to upgrade scalafix-maven-plugin version [1]. I hope
> it will be approvable by the maintainer.
>

I think there is little chance for it to be approved when there is
https://github.com/evis/scalafix-maven-plugin/pull/12 but you never know
If you are going to upgrade scalafix any why did you chose to stop at 0.9.25
instead of going for the latest release (0.9.29) ?


> I also have another request to James [2], that implement scalafix tool.
>

awesome !


> [1] https://github.com/evis/scalafix-maven-plugin/pull/15
> [2] https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/538
>
> Cheers,
> Tung
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 6:59 PM Jean Helou <jean.he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Yes, I did. I forked this plugin and manual change scala version on
> > local.
> > > As I wrote
> > >
> >
> > sorry I didn't catch that in your original email
> >
> > > "I got another issue: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> > > scala.reflect.internal.util.ReusableInstance,
> > > scala/collection/IterableOnce"
> > > Maybe need more time to check.
> > >
> >
> > just a thought but the maven plugin hasn't been updated in a while and
> > pulls scalafix 0.9.23
> > https://github.com/scalacenter/scalafix/releases/tag/v0.9.26 mentions
> > scala
> > 2.13.5 with link to a PR[1] which explicitely mentions the rule you are
> > trying to use :)
> >
> > can you try upgrading scalafix version from 9.23 at least to 9.26 (even
> > better to 9.29  in your local build ?
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/scalacenter/scalafix/pull/1334/files
> >
> > cheers,
> > jean
> >
> > Thank you,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 6:34 PM Jean Helou <jean.he...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is my configuration
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > looks good to me, so it looks like the plugin is indeed pinned on
> scala
> > > > 2.12, you could clone the repo, change the plugin version to a custom
> > > > version, change references to scala 2.12 to scala 2.13 and run an
> > install
> > > > locally to check that having the plugin itself compiled against 2.13
> > > works.
> > > > if it does you can chime in on the PR to try and get it merged in an
> > > > official manner.
> > > > What I usually do in such cases is publish an unofficial version of
> the
> > > > tool on an unofficial repo and use that until the PR is merged. not
> > sure
> > > > how that flies for apache projects though especially since the plugin
> > > uses
> > > > a BSD3 license.
> > > > Since it's not a published artifact of the project maybe we are
> allowed
> > > to
> > > > do that as long as we publish the custom build to a public repo ? I
> > used
> > > to
> > > > publish on bintray not sure where to go now ..
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jean
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:21 PM Jean Helou <jean.he...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Tung,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Very interesting with the rewrite feature of the scalafix tool.
> > > > > > > I tried it for the `jmap-rfc-8621` module. I got an
> incompatible
> > > > issue
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > the scala version when trying Semantic Rules.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > According to the issue you link to, the plugin only works with
> > scala
> > > > 2.12
> > > > > > and according to the error message you report, the james code
> base
> > > uses
> > > > > > scala 2.13.
> > > > > > In this case it won't work unless the plugin is cross compiled
> for
> > > > 2.13.
> > > > > > What's intriguing is that the tips and tricks section [1] has a
> > > sample
> > > > > > configuration for the semantic db compiler  which seems ot hint
> > that
> > > > the
> > > > > > scala.version can be configured. but i actually doubt it would
> work
> > > > > >
> > > > > > can you share the configuration you used ?
> > > > > > [1]
> https://github.com/evis/scalafix-maven-plugin#tips-and-tricks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't use the maven plugin itself, all my scala projects use
> > either
> > > > SBT
> > > > > > or mill so I don't have this layer of issues.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Jean
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://github.com/evis/scalafix-maven-plugin/pull/12
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Tung
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 2:44 PM Jean Helou <
> jean.he...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi tung,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Have you looked at scalafix[1]? it seems to be much more
> > actively
> > > > > > > > maintained than scalastyle and I feel that it's scope
> overlaps
> > > > > > > scalatyle's
> > > > > > > > quite a bit...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]https://github.com/scalacenter/scalafix
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > jean
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 8:14 AM tungtv...@gmail.com <
> > > > > > tungtv...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hello guys,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I realize the current checkstyle.xml file doesn't support
> the
> > > > Scala
> > > > > > > > > convention.
> > > > > > > > > Should we have a checkstyle for that?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > My suggestion:
> > > > > > > > > - https://github.com/scalastyle/scalastyle
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - https://github.com/scalastyle/scalastyle-maven-plugin
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Tung, Van TRAN
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Tung, Tran Van
> > > > > > > *Phone:* (+84) 35 757 6258
> > > > > > > *Skype:* tung.tv202
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Tung, Tran Van
> > > > > *Phone:* (+84) 35 757 6258
> > > > > *Skype:* tung.tv202
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tung, Tran Van
> > > *Phone:* (+84) 35 757 6258
> > > *Skype:* tung.tv202
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Tung, Tran Van
> *Phone:* (+84) 35 757 6258
> *Skype:* tung.tv202
>

Reply via email to