I agree with you. The rage now is to have everything web based, even where and when a client-server application or something else is better. But this would lead to an off-topic debate.
Vincenzo > -----Original Message----- > From: Clark D. Richey, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mercoled� 16 luglio 2003 13.37 > To: 'James Users List' > Subject: RE: James Console Contribution > > > Out of curiosity, what is intrinsically better about a web based > application? For something like this you are likely to want the rich GUI > feature set available in SWT/Swing and the security of it NOT being > available on the web. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Samuel Arnod-Prin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:41 AM > To: James Users List > Subject: Re: James Console Contribution > > Rodr�guez Migu�lez, Adolfo wrote: > > >Hi All, > > > >here is a basic Console for managing James Mail Server from my own. It > is > >developed as GPL licence so you can feel free to use it any time. It is > >developed as an standalone Java app written in SWT. > > > > > congratulations, but wouldn't it be better to developp a web based > application ??? > I love criticizing ... It's already a really good idea to have > developped it in Java for portability reason... > In fact, why doesn't the James team think to add a web based > administration site to handle the "heavy" xml file ? > A tiny webmin... > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
