>> Their DNSRBL is one of the worst, and should never be used, anyway.
Yeah... tell that to the servers that ARE using it and bouncing my mail.... :-( No editorial comment here.... but the fact that their home page begs people to contribute to their legal defense fund says volumes... -----Original Message----- From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:54 AM To: James Users List Subject: RE: "Delayed Bounces" and SpamCop > SpamCop simply says I shouldn't do 'delayed bounce' Their DNSRBL is one of the worst, and should never be used, anyway. > Alternatively, I (i.e. my mail server) should simply reject the > request in the SMTP server if it is an invalid recipient address > But that means running my virtual address mailet inside the James > SMTP server in order for it to determine valid/invalid, which I > don't think is possible in James, is it? Not yet. It is code that we're working on already. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
