Hi, we create a VirtualUserTableService which is accessable from many components. So its possible for the ValidRcptHandler to check also for VirtualUserTable mappings. The mapping still haben in the mailet. Only error: mappings directly mapped by ValidRcptHandler.
bye Norman JWM schrieb: > Thanks, Norman... > > But I'm not sure what you mean by "exists on SMTP-level". > > I use the JDBCVirtualUserTable mailet that maps incoming emailaddress/domain > to actual user inboxes. There's no way to know if an inbound emailaddress > is valid or not until it runs through the vitual user mapper mailet. > > Does this mailet get run at SMTP inbound processing time in order to > determine whether to fast-fail or not? > > Thanks. > > Jerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Norman Maurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 1:00 PM > To: James Users List > Subject: Re: "Delayed Bounces" and SpamCop > > If you intressted in this features you should checkout trunk. There is a > ValidRcptHandler which reject emails to recipients which not exists on > SMTP-level > > bye > Norman > > Chase Seibert schrieb: > >> I'd like to request support for this feature as well. Currently we want to >> > implement JAMES, but would not consider it until this is supported. Isn't > this how the vast majority of email servers do bouncing by default? > >> >> >> -Chase >> >> >> >> Application Developer >> B U L L H O R N >> >> >> >> >> Staffing and Recruiting Software On Demand >> >> The Last Software You'll Ever Need >> 33-41 Farnsworth Street, 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02210 >> 617.478.9119 >> www.bullhorn.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From:Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> To: "James Users List" <[email protected]>; >> Sent: Nov 10, 2006 02:39:11 AM >> Subject: Re: "Delayed Bounces" and SpamCop >> Yes thats correct! >> >> bye >> Norman >> >> JWM schrieb: >> >> >>> I'm getting confused... that's what I want to do (fast-fail). The way I >>> understand it now is that this is not possible in the current release, >>> > but > >>> is being developed and is available in pre-alpha releases (trunk). Is >>> > this > >>> correct? >>> >>> Jerry >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:54 AM >>> To: James Users List >>> Subject: RE: "Delayed Bounces" and SpamCop >>> >>> It is best to use fast-fail rejection whenver possible, and not use >>> DSN/Bounce notices. >>> >>> --- Noel >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> !EXCUBATOR:1,455370ea53076722744073! >>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> !EXCUBATOR:1,4561f76e53073918616236! >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:1,45620c0f53071277883219! > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
