I'd like to request support for this feature as well. Currently we want to implement JAMES, but would not consider it until this is supported. Isn't this how the vast majority of email servers do bouncing by default?
-Chase Application Developer B U L L H O R N Staffing and Recruiting Software On Demand The Last Software You'll Ever Need 33-41 Farnsworth Street, 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02210 617.478.9119 www.bullhorn.com -----Original Message----- From:Norman Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "James Users List" <[email protected]>; Sent: Nov 10, 2006 02:39:11 AM Subject: Re: "Delayed Bounces" and SpamCop Yes thats correct! bye Norman JWM schrieb: > I'm getting confused... that's what I want to do (fast-fail). The way I > understand it now is that this is not possible in the current release, but > is being developed and is available in pre-alpha releases (trunk). Is this > correct? > > Jerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:54 AM > To: James Users List > Subject: RE: "Delayed Bounces" and SpamCop > > It is best to use fast-fail rejection whenver possible, and not use > DSN/Bounce notices. > > --- Noel > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:1,455370ea53076722744073! > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
