Jack wrote: > I followed your instructions but Windows popped up a > dialog saying a certain error occurred. So, I > performed some searches on google and found that > "domain", like "workgroup", is a form of logical > collection of computers that share resources in a > Windows LAN. The meaning of "domain" in Windows > networking is not the same as that of domain names > like yahoo.com, google.com, etc. (See > http://kb.iu.edu/data/adgs.html and > http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/networking/expert/crawford_02january14.mspx)
You found the wrong DOMAIN configuration. Unfortunately Microsoft made some confusion when decided to use the "DOMAIN" word to define both the dns domain and windows domain. They are 2 different things. What windows release are you using? I'm sure that if you search it better you can find the configuration I've described previously. http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/sysdm_ident_change_domain_name.mspx?mfr=true > Besides, the method you suggested won't work if james > handles emails for more than one domain. According to > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/OeSixForwardFps, > the domain name in the Message-ID header should match > the one in the From header. For instance, if the From > header is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", the Message-ID should be > "<xxxx... example.com>". Suppose I use James to handle > emails for example1.com and example2.com. If I set the > computer name to example1.com, then an email sent by > me from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" through James will have the > message-id "<xxxx... example1.com>". As a result, the > domain names in the From header and Message-ID header > do not match. The RFC does not require that the Message-ID domain equals the From domain. Furthermore I never heard before of the SA rule described in that page. That page is about a problem of OE6 that does not rewrite the Message-ID when the from change. The missed rfc compliance is about that when the message is modified then the message-id should be changed. Maybe someone else have a different idea on this and I would like to read more about this issue, but I still think this is not a James bug. If you want to manually change James then I suggest you to look at the class MimeMessageWrapper and to look at javamail 1.4 sources to understand what to do to customize the MessageId. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
