On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 02:14:40 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Ah! I guess we get used to talking about "at a safepoint" when we really mean > "at a fixed point in time". So the VM is not necessarily at a safepoint, but > everything is fixed. So invariants may not hold, but the state cannot change. Correct! > So in the current context the anonymous owner should be found ... That's what I concluded based on Roman's description of how things work. > I guess the question to be answered is how the code tries to find an > anonymous owner? I'm not sure how you can find it. I'm not sure yet. I'll need to have a look. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15907#discussion_r1336555978
