On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 02:48:17 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Looks like you answered my question while I was asking it. > > And I shouldn't have said "cache". I was confusing this PR with another > dealing with the Monitor Cache. ...although that is a pretty small window and we are seeing this bug quite a lot. Seems if the code in question was the issue, it would take 1000s of iterations to reproduce. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15907#discussion_r1336576620
