On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 09:39:55 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Pavel, these changes look OK to me. > > Over time I think it will be harder to keep track or enforce this in code > comments but I think it is easier to enforce for API specification text. Moving from "interrupted" to "interrupt" was a slow drift rather than a landslide. I think it's okay to repair it once. _Loom_ is already in and once _structured concurrency_ is in, I don't expect many new occurrences of "interrupt" in the foreseeable future. But you are right, the important bit is the specification, not the code comments. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27972#issuecomment-3460767516
