On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 13:26:33 GMT, Anton Artemov <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Hi, please consider the following changes:
>> 
>> If suspension is allowed when a thread is re-entering an object monitor 
>> (OM), then a following liveness issues can happen in the 
>> `ObjectMonitor::wait()` method.
>> 
>> The waiting thread is made to be a successor and is unparked. Upon a 
>> suspension request, the thread will suspend itself whilst clearing the 
>> successor. The OM will be left unlocked (not grabbed by any thread), while 
>> the other threads are parked until a thread grabs the OM and the exits it. 
>> The suspended thread is on the entry-list and can be selected as a successor 
>> again. None of other threads can be woken up to grab the OM until the 
>> suspended thread has been resumed and successfully releases the OM.
>> 
>> This can happen in three places where the successor could be suspended: 
>> 
>> 1:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/6322aaba63b235cb6c73d23a932210af318404ec/src/hotspot/share/runtime/objectMonitor.cpp#L1897
>> 
>> 2:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/6322aaba63b235cb6c73d23a932210af318404ec/src/hotspot/share/runtime/objectMonitor.cpp#L1149
>> 
>> 3:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/6322aaba63b235cb6c73d23a932210af318404ec/src/hotspot/share/runtime/objectMonitor.cpp#L1951
>> 
>> The issues are addressed by not allowing suspension in case 1, and by 
>> handling the suspension request at a later stage, after the thread has 
>> grabbed the OM in `reenter_internal()` in case 2. In case of a suspension 
>> request, the thread exits the OM and enters it again once resumed. 
>> 
>> Case 3 is handled by not transferring a thread to the `entry_list` in 
>> `notify_internal()` in case the corresponding JVMTI event is allowed. 
>> Instead, a tread is unparked and let run. Since it is not on the 
>> `entry_list`, it will not be chosen as a successor and it is no harm to 
>> suspend it if needed when posting the event. 
>> 
>> Possible issue of posting a `waited` event while still be suspended is 
>> addressed by adding a suspension check just before the posting of event.
>> 
>> Tests are added.
>> 
>> Tested in tiers 1 - 7.
>
> Anton Artemov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   8366659: Addressed reviewers' comments.

src/hotspot/share/runtime/objectMonitor.cpp line 1916:

> 1914:       }
> 1915:     }
> 1916:     // The thread is now either on off-list (TS_RUN),

Suggestion:

    // The thread is now either off-list (TS_RUN),

Pre-existing typo

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27040#discussion_r2715241999

Reply via email to