On Mon, 11 May 2026 14:19:50 GMT, David Simms <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is a "*sub-review pull request*" for the first 
> [preview](https://openjdk.org/jeps/12) of [JEP 401: Value Classes and 
> Objects](https://openjdk.org/jeps/401), specifically 
> [JDK-8317278](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317278): JVM 
> implementation of value classes and objects.
> 
>> [!NOTE]
>> This pull request and the other sub-review pull requests listed below are 
>> based on the "*master pull request*" 
>> (https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31120). It contains the same full set 
>> of code changes as the "*master pull request*" to preserve the full 
>> implementation context; the language compiler, JVM, and standard library 
>> changes are intertwined. This separate pull requests exist only to subdivide 
>> the review and related discussion by area.
> 
> Other areas for review:
> 
> - [JDK-8317277](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317277): Java language 
> implementation of value classes and objects
>   - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31121
> - [JDK-8317279](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317279): Standard 
> library implementation of value classes and objects
>   - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31123
> 
> Code changes resulting from the review process should be made in 
> [`valhalla/lworld`](https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/).
> 
> `valhalla/lworld` is currently updated from `jdk/master` whenever a weekly 
> [`jdk` tag](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/tags) is created. At that time, 
> code changes from `valhalla/lworld` will be propagated to the master pull 
> request and to all sub-review pull requests, including this one.
> 
> Ultimately, review sign-off will be recorded on the "*master pull request*", 
> and this pull request will be closed without integration.
> 
> This pull request has a large code surface area and often conflicts with 
> `jdk/master` on a daily basis. Refer to 
> [`valhalla/lworld`](https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/) for the latest 
> state of the project code, keeping in mind that it may lag several days 
> behind `jdk/master`. Both repositories may be needed as references during 
> review.
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

Few initial questions

.github/workflows/build-linux.yml line 146:

> 144:           --with-zlib=system
> 145:           --with-jmod-compress=zip-1
> 146:           --disable-jvm-feature-shenandoahgc

I assume this will not be part of final changes. Right?

.github/workflows/main.yml line 177:

> 175:                 echo 'true'
> 176:                 return
> 177:               fi

This one is for Valhalla repo only I think.

make/conf/version-numbers.conf line 43:

> 41: DEFAULT_JDK_SOURCE_TARGET_VERSION=27
> 42: DEFAULT_PROMOTED_VERSION_PRE=ea
> 43: 

Empty line

src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/aarch64.ad line 1865:

> 1863:                               // the hard way
> 1864: }
> 1865: 

This could be pushed in separate RFE.

src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/c2_CodeStubs_aarch64.cpp line 62:

> 60: 
> 61:   __ bind(guard());
> 62:   __ relocate(entry_guard_Relocation::spec());

Why it was removed?

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122#pullrequestreview-4339913990
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122#discussion_r3283710665
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122#discussion_r3283717302
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122#discussion_r3283721592
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122#discussion_r3283842141
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122#discussion_r3283875127

Reply via email to