On Thu, 21 May 2026 16:26:44 GMT, Andrew Dinn <[email protected]> wrote:

>> David Simms has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 2732 commits:
>> 
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'valhalla/lworld' into 8317277
>>  - 8385344: [lworld] ProblemList 
>> tools/javac/platform/CanHandleClassFilesTest.java with --enable-preview
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: fparain
>>  - 8385301: [lworld] Remove 
>> serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java from problem list
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: dsimms
>>  - 8385331: [lworld] adjust ValueComparisonTest.java again to work around 
>> JDK-8370769
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: dsimms
>>  - 8385311: [lworld] TypePtr::eq() should use accessor method for _offset
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: mchevalier
>>  - 8385259: [lworld] Clean up LP64 in x86 code
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: dlong, thartmann
>>  - Merge
>>    
>>    Merge jdk-27+23
>>  - 8384924: [lworld] misc cleanups
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: thartmann
>>  - 8385167: [lworld] C1: minor cleanups
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: dlong, thartmann
>>  - 8384066: [lworld] TestDeadAllocationRemoval.java is ignored by jtreg
>>    
>>    Reviewed-by: thartmann
>>  - ... and 2722 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/86637704...b3b4a2cb
>
> src/hotspot/share/runtime/stubRoutines.cpp line 104:
> 
>> 102: 
>> 103: // TODO: update with 8343767
>> 104: address StubRoutines::_load_inline_type_fields_in_regs = nullptr;
> 
> (relocating this to the correct PR)
> Re that TODO: these two fields and the associated getters need to be 
> generated via suitable stub and entry declarations (see 
> stubDeclarations.hpp). That will also provide an associated StubId, EntryId, 
> name, etc. Also, the generator routine for these stubs in the AArch64 and x86 
> implementations needs to co-operate with the AOT stub save and restore 
> process by calling `load_archive_data` and `store_archive_data` -- along the 
> same lines as the other StubGen Initial stubs. I can advise if needed.

Thanks @adinn! I filed 
[JDK-8385569](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8385569) for this.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122#discussion_r3317207085

Reply via email to