On Wed, 13 May 2026 06:53:45 GMT, Dean Long <[email protected]> wrote:
>> David Simms has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 2732 commits: >> >> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'valhalla/lworld' into 8317277 >> - 8385344: [lworld] ProblemList >> tools/javac/platform/CanHandleClassFilesTest.java with --enable-preview >> >> Reviewed-by: fparain >> - 8385301: [lworld] Remove >> serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackMixedWithXComp.java from problem list >> >> Reviewed-by: dsimms >> - 8385331: [lworld] adjust ValueComparisonTest.java again to work around >> JDK-8370769 >> >> Reviewed-by: dsimms >> - 8385311: [lworld] TypePtr::eq() should use accessor method for _offset >> >> Reviewed-by: mchevalier >> - 8385259: [lworld] Clean up LP64 in x86 code >> >> Reviewed-by: dlong, thartmann >> - Merge >> >> Merge jdk-27+23 >> - 8384924: [lworld] misc cleanups >> >> Reviewed-by: thartmann >> - 8385167: [lworld] C1: minor cleanups >> >> Reviewed-by: dlong, thartmann >> - 8384066: [lworld] TestDeadAllocationRemoval.java is ignored by jtreg >> >> Reviewed-by: thartmann >> - ... and 2722 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/86637704...b3b4a2cb > > src/hotspot/share/c1/c1_LIRGenerator.cpp line 1550: > >> 1548: static LIR_Opr null_marker_mask(BasicType bt, int nm_offset) { >> 1549: assert(nm_offset >= 0, "field does not have null marker"); >> 1550: jlong null_marker = 1ULL << (nm_offset << LogBitsPerByte); > > Doesn't this give the wrong value for big-endian? (resolved) ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122#discussion_r3320971839
