On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 01:57:39 GMT, David Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Not sure why this is using UNIX_PATH_MAX but pre-existing so ignore this too. > > No I take that back. If the path prefix is now arbitrary then we could easily > exceed UNIX_PATH_MAX. Yes, we can. I added this because it failed in my local testing. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31407#discussion_r3387998356
