On Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:53:25 GMT, David Simms <[email protected]> wrote:

>> This is a "*sub-review pull request*" for the first 
>> [preview](https://openjdk.org/jeps/12) of [JEP 401: Value 
>> Objects](https://openjdk.org/jeps/401), specifically 
>> [JDK-8317278](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317278): JVM 
>> implementation of value objects.
>> 
>>> [!NOTE]
>>> This pull request and the other sub-review pull requests listed below are 
>>> based on the "*master pull request*" 
>>> (https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31120). It contains the same full set 
>>> of code changes as the "*master pull request*" to preserve the full 
>>> implementation context; the language compiler, JVM, and standard library 
>>> changes are intertwined. This separate pull requests exist only to 
>>> subdivide the review and related discussion by area.
>> 
>> Other areas for review:
>> 
>> - [JDK-8317277](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317277): Java language 
>> implementation of value objects
>>   - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31121
>> - [JDK-8317279](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317279): Standard 
>> library implementation of value objects
>>   - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31123
>> 
>> Code changes resulting from the review process should be made in 
>> [`valhalla/lworld`](https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/).
>> 
>> `valhalla/lworld` is currently updated from `jdk/master` whenever a weekly 
>> [`jdk` tag](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/tags) is created. At that time, 
>> code changes from `valhalla/lworld` will be propagated to the master pull 
>> request and to all sub-review pull requests, including this one.
>> 
>> Ultimately, review sign-off will be recorded on the "*master pull request*", 
>> and this pull request will be closed without integration.
>> 
>> This pull request has a large code surface area and often conflicts with 
>> `jdk/master` on a daily basis. Refer to 
>> [`valhalla/lworld`](https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla/) for the latest 
>> state of the project code, keeping in mind that it may lag several days 
>> behind `jdk/master`. Both repositories may be needed as references during 
>> review.
>> 
>> ---------
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> David Simms has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 2935 commits:
> 
>  - Merge branch '8317277' into jep401_sub_review_8317278
>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'valhalla/lworld' into 8317277
>  - 8389322: [lworld] Disable TestNullableInlineTypes::test103() until 
> JDK-8389088 is fixed
>    
>    Reviewed-by: thartmann, dcubed
>  - 8389085: [lworld] C2: assert(field_value != nullptr) failed in 
> PhaseMacroExpand::inline_type_from_mem
>    
>    Reviewed-by: mhaessig, chagedorn
>  - 8388966: [lworld] compiler/igvn/TestMaskedStoreIdealization.java fails 
> with Valhalla
>    
>    Reviewed-by: mchevalier, thartmann
>  - 8388928: [lworld] ProblemList 
> compiler/vectorapi/TestVectorReassociations.java
>    
>    Reviewed-by: thartmann
>  - Merge
>    
>    Merge jdk-28+8
>  - Merge
>    
>    Merge jdk-28+7
>  - 8388318: [lworld] jdk.internal.value.Deserializer annotation should not be 
> honored on application classes
>    
>    Reviewed-by: dlsmith, alanb, jpai
>  - 8388462: [lworld] Provide more context about wrapper class caches
>    
>    Reviewed-by: darcy, thartmann
>  - ... and 2925 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/5428159f...64224e8b

It's done, thanks everyone: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/31120

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31122#issuecomment-5137926213

Reply via email to