Milt Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Manish, Singh (IE10) wrote:
>
>> Very true but the problem is why work on something which u know is
>> dead.
>
> What's perhaps even more relevant, it may not be reasonable to expect
> to be able to upgrade all the other components of the system (e.g. the
> JDK) while staying with the same version of the web server. If he's
> happy with what he's got, he's perfectly welcome to stay with it. But
> if he wants to upgrade part of it, he may need to upgrade all of it.
> That's just the way things work sometimes.
Well, if we followed that scheme, nobody would have ever switched to Java...
C/C++ still works, why switching? :)
> Also, as to servlet container options, Tomcat is not the only one that
> is still being developed and upgraded.
Yep, there are valid alternatives (I'm kicking myself saying that), Tomcat
is not the _ONLY_ servlet container available, it's just the reference
implementation... And with 4.0 we hope to be able to have a more efficent
solution, but we're still developing it...
Pier
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pier Fumagalli - Sun Microsystems Inc. - <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
