=?iso-8859-1?Q?Endre_St=F8lsvik?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Paul Copeland wrote: > > | > | It is a common misunderstanding that Enterprise Java == EJB - that is > | incorrect > > That is mostly correct, actually. At least it is such a -common- > misunderstanding that talking about it otherwise is just plain > non-interesting. > > J2EE is to most people when you use a Enterprise Bean Container, thus > EJBs. Without that massive thing, you don't have -any- of the hassle that > J2EE stands for. J2EE is when you use the full EAR-filetype.
I agree. This is what people "think it is" so it's what it is. Whatever Sun's marketing people actually say. Does anyone actually like ear's btw? Whenever I've built an ear it's always been a giant pain. This is another symptom of Java's divorce from the operating system. Nic ___________________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST". Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
