On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:30 PM Sam Hague <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Faseela K <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> There was a discussion in last genius weekly call, whether we can >> disable tunnel monitoring by default. >> >> Vishal indicated that netvirt would prefer disabling monitoring by >> default. >> >> And can be enabled explicitly if required. >> >> Any concerns if we do that? >> > This is a good idea. We talked about this a while back also and thought we > decided to do the same. The upstream netvirt csit does not use bfd. > > Does disabling the bfd have any impact on the tunnel issues that are being > debugged or is this a benign change? > Tunnel issues in apex job were about creation [btw, fixed now] and won't be impacted by this. This change would "speed" up how quickly tunnels move to state UP, but other than that no change. > > This would clean up the logs also as the bfd stuff is noisy in the > ovsdb/vswitchd logs that the upstream csit collects. > Yes, bfd changes make ovs-vswitchd logs hard to read, too many newlines and too frequent. > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Faseela >> _______________________________________________ >> sfc-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > genius-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/genius-dev >
_______________________________________________ sfc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
