No objections from me, thanks. Regards,
*Brady Johnson* [email protected] On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:31 AM Faseela K <[email protected]> wrote: > Brady/David, > > Any objections from sfc side? > > Thanks, > > Faseela > > > > *From:* Sam Hague [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 19, 2018 10:30 PM > *To:* Faseela K <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected]; [email protected]; > odl netvirt dev <[email protected]>; Brady Allen Johnson > <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [sfc-dev] Disable BFD monitoring for tunnels by default > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Faseela K <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There was a discussion in last genius weekly call, whether we can > disable tunnel monitoring by default. > > Vishal indicated that netvirt would prefer disabling monitoring by > default. > > And can be enabled explicitly if required. > > Any concerns if we do that? > > This is a good idea. We talked about this a while back also and thought we > decided to do the same. The upstream netvirt csit does not use bfd. > > > > Does disabling the bfd have any impact on the tunnel issues that are being > debugged or is this a benign change? > > > > This would clean up the logs also as the bfd stuff is noisy in the > ovsdb/vswitchd logs that the upstream csit collects. > > > > Thanks, > > Faseela > > _______________________________________________ > sfc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev > >
_______________________________________________ sfc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
