Yes - that (removing in SR1) sounds a good idea to me.

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 9:22 AM Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote:

> If it is too late to remove SFC now I would advocate to remove it in
> Sodium SR1 (we did this in the past with other projects that suddenly
> became abandoned). The only way I can see SFC during Sodium support cycle
> is if someone steps up to do the basic project maintenance, but I do not
> think this is going to happen.
>
> BR/Luis
>
> On Sep 16, 2019, at 9:11 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your thoughts Thanh and Anil - very good points. I agree with
> Thanh that we do not want to delay the release further. So the best course
> of action as Thanh suggested seems to be to release note that SFC test
> failure for Sodium and say that SFC is marked for removal as a managed
> project in Magnesium. We may want to add that SFC may not have any further
> fixes during the Sodium SRs as they are transitioning to a self managed
> project for Magnesium.
>
> Let us conclude this vote as not passed. I will respond on Luis' thread
> about overall release status.
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 7:09 AM Anil Vishnoi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I believe it's not a matter of few test failing. It's pretty much dead
>> code in my opinion and i have a doubt that even it's basic usecase is
>> working anymore.
>> Now do we want to keep shipping this dead code and support it for next 1
>> year (6 month stable support, 6 month security support)? I am not sure if
>> there is anyone to support this code even in self-managed mode. If removing
>> this code from managed project delays the relase by a week (nothing new in
>> ODL history, we did it many times, many reasons ), in my person opinion, we
>> should just do it.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 6:42 AM Thanh ha <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree here. It seems wrong to me to remove it from Sodium this late
>>> into the release cycle unless we really want to delay the release some
>>> more. In the initial email thread this list Stephen's patch
>>> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/netvirt/+/84369 will remove it
>>> from netvirt but this would require that to be merged and then we need to
>>> respin everything.
>>>
>>> Could we maybe release note the SFC test failure for Sodium and mention
>>> that it is marked for removal as a managed project in Magnesium?
>>>
>>> That would at least flag to the users that SFC has known issues and we
>>> can likely proceed with the release.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Thanh
>>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 07:40, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the feedback Robert and Daniel. We do need to disable SFC
>>>> from NetVirt, right? Isn't there an engineering effort required for that?
>>>> Or is it OK to ship with those tests failing?
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 10:41 PM Daniel De La Rosa <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 10:28 PM Robert Varga <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 16/09/2019 06:34, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote:
>>>>>> > Hello TSC,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > There was a discussion in the TSC meeting to move SFC project to be
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> > self managed project for Sodium as SFC members have mostly moved on
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> > have also not attended any TSC meetings. Subsequently we also sent
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> > email to the SFC project titled "SFC and Sodium". Since there was no
>>>>>> > response, it is time for the TSC to vote on whether SFC should be
>>>>>> > removed from the Sodium release.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > *Hence please vote either -1, 0 or +1 for the following question:*
>>>>>> > *
>>>>>> > *
>>>>>> > *Shall SFC be removed from Sodium as a managed project and be
>>>>>> considered
>>>>>> > as a self managed project? Note - this will likely need us to
>>>>>> remove it
>>>>>> > from the Sodium distribution.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release is ready, this would require a re-spin and re-signoff for
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> release that is already 11 days late.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the (very strong) reason to even be considering this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think there is one and I thought that we talked about doing
>>>>> this ( and other) projects to self managed for magnesium in the TSC
>>>>> meeting. I think is better to keep Sodium release date on time but start
>>>>> working on this ASAP for Magnesium
>>>>>
>>>>> my two pesos
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FTR: I strongly believe this pruning should have happened at the Final
>>>>>> Checkpoint at the latest -- i.e. a month ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>>>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> View/Reply Online (#18011):
>>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/release/message/18011
>>>>>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34161125/1964961
>>>>>> Group Owner: [email protected]
>>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/release/unsub  [
>>>>>> [email protected]]
>>>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel de la Rosa
>>>>> Customer Support Manager
>>>>> Lumina Networks Inc.
>>>>> e: [email protected]
>>>>> m:  +1 408 7728120
>>>>>
>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>>>>
>>>> View/Reply Online (#11900):
>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/message/11900
>>>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34161393/1869318
>>>> Group Owner: [email protected]
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/unsub  [
>>>> [email protected]]
>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>>
>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>>>
>>> View/Reply Online (#18017):
>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/release/message/18017
>>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34164484/1199232
>>> Group Owner: [email protected]
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/release/unsub  [
>>> [email protected]]
>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>> Anil
>>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>
> View/Reply Online (#11903):
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/message/11903
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34161393/1217165
> Group Owner: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/unsub  [[email protected]
> ]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#4771): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/sfc-dev/message/4771
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34166269/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/sfc-dev/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to