I agree here. It seems wrong to me to remove it from Sodium this late into the release cycle unless we really want to delay the release some more. In the initial email thread this list Stephen's patch https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/netvirt/+/84369 will remove it from netvirt but this would require that to be merged and then we need to respin everything.
Could we maybe release note the SFC test failure for Sodium and mention that it is marked for removal as a managed project in Magnesium? That would at least flag to the users that SFC has known issues and we can likely proceed with the release. Regards, Thanh On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 07:40, Abhijit Kumbhare <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Robert and Daniel. We do need to disable SFC from > NetVirt, right? Isn't there an engineering effort required for that? Or is > it OK to ship with those tests failing? > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 10:41 PM Daniel De La Rosa < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 10:28 PM Robert Varga <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 16/09/2019 06:34, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote: >>> > Hello TSC, >>> > >>> > There was a discussion in the TSC meeting to move SFC project to be a >>> > self managed project for Sodium as SFC members have mostly moved on and >>> > have also not attended any TSC meetings. Subsequently we also sent an >>> > email to the SFC project titled "SFC and Sodium". Since there was no >>> > response, it is time for the TSC to vote on whether SFC should be >>> > removed from the Sodium release. >>> > >>> > *Hence please vote either -1, 0 or +1 for the following question:* >>> > * >>> > * >>> > *Shall SFC be removed from Sodium as a managed project and be >>> considered >>> > as a self managed project? Note - this will likely need us to remove it >>> > from the Sodium distribution.* >>> >>> -1. >>> >>> The release is ready, this would require a re-spin and re-signoff for a >>> release that is already 11 days late. >>> >>> What is the (very strong) reason to even be considering this? >>> >> >> I don't think there is one and I thought that we talked about doing this >> ( and other) projects to self managed for magnesium in the TSC meeting. I >> think is better to keep Sodium release date on time but start working on >> this ASAP for Magnesium >> >> my two pesos >> >> >>> >>> FTR: I strongly believe this pruning should have happened at the Final >>> Checkpoint at the latest -- i.e. a month ago. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Robert >>> >>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. >>> >>> View/Reply Online (#18011): >>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/release/message/18011 >>> Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34161125/1964961 >>> Group Owner: [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/release/unsub [ >>> [email protected]] >>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel de la Rosa >> Customer Support Manager >> Lumina Networks Inc. >> e: [email protected] >> m: +1 408 7728120 >> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > > View/Reply Online (#11900): > https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/message/11900 > Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34161393/1869318 > Group Owner: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/TSC/unsub [[email protected] > ] > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4773): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/sfc-dev/message/4773 Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34176435/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/sfc-dev/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
