Because Im developing it as a prototype - and maybe you guys wont use it and
Ill continue it on my own. J

 

If you guys like it, we can use it and discuss chaning namespace as well. Or
we could treat it as a lib like we do mono . J

 

--

Chad Z. Hower aka Kudzu

"Programming is an art form that fights back"

http://www.KudzuWorld.com/

http://www.Woo-Hoo.net/

http://www.DelphiToDotNet.com/

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Pieter Mees
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 12:37 AM
To: sharpos-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SharpOS Developers] Project governance

 

I have no problems with this model. So as far as I'm concerned, yes.

Ow, by the way, I noticed the root namespace of the prototype AOT on
CodePlex is Indy? Why is that?

 

Insite Mees-Delbeke VOF

Zomerstraat 29A

9270 Laarne

Telefoon: 09 367 96 34

GSM: 0478 44 96 04

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Site: http://www.insitehosting.be <http://www.insitehosting.be/> 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce
Sent: donderdag 30 augustus 2007 22:27
To: sharpos-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SharpOS Developers] Project governance

 

 

On 8/30/07, Chad Z. Hower aka Kudzu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> As this project was not started by any one person, I personally like
> FreeBSD Core Board model. At first, until we have a working kernel and
> bootable OS, we would consist of a provisional board consisting of the 
> active core people as generally determined by this mailing list and IRC
> (so far, looks to be me, William, Chriss, Bruce, and Chad. Please add /
> delete if otherwise). Other members may be added with a simple majority 

Matthijs, and there are a few others that are pretty "active lurkers" if
that's  a word that might be worth considering.

As far as the FreeBSD model. To be honest I wasn't aware of it, but its 
almost identical to the Indy model which was worked out over the years. So
absolutely it sounds like a great starting (and maybe finishing point even)

Fine tuning possible if needed according to discussion.


I agree. Whole-heartedly. I would question my own position on the list,
because as of late I've been little more than an "active lurker" - but if we
will include everyone in that category, then I think that will work great. 

So uh, should we vote on it? ;-)

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
SharpOS-Developers mailing list
SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers

Reply via email to