> If we were to go by time invested and seniority, then here is the list > that I would initially recommend. However, I agree with Chad that we
Im not going to reply bullet by bullet because I think your message is very well thought out and agree on nearly all points. I just want to reiterate though - that if the current owners make the new board just them or not much bigger, not much will really change unless their first action is to vote and start adding more members. Scott pointed out that the list size is 84, so my first suggestion of adding everyone is withdrawn. But I think the initial board needs to be "fluffed" a little bit if the situation is to actually change materially. Electing a board that consists of the same people who are in defacto control won't change things much. I'd suggest we put out a poll to ask who is interested. That list is compiled and decided on. Its my guess that the list would not be over a dozen people, if even that large. IF so - its my suggestion that the best thing to do would be just accept those in faith that anyone interested enough to stay on the list and reply should be granted initial access. From that point on though closed as you say and only entry by vote. Any objections to at least polling and seeing who is interested and collecting those names? Non bininding this point - just to see how big the interested list would even be. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
