> Well, like I said in that mail, I support something a bit broader, > like the mailing list-based voting.
Yes, I know you do. Others haven't registered their thoughts yet. :) > Why? As I said above, we just open the membership to anyone who is > currently on the mailing list, but they'd have to "register" somehow, > either by posting a list message requesting it or by getting a hold of > the person we put in charge of gathering memberships. My original suggestion was just automatically include everyone on the list - at that point someone had told me the list was only a dozen or so. That is the motion I withdraw. I fully support the current one to ask who is interested. > > Any objections to at least polling and seeing who is interested and > > collecting those names? Non bininding this point - just to see how > big the > > interested list would even be. > > Not at all. And I see you already posted a message, to that's great. :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
