On 8/31/07, Chad Z. Hower aka Kudzu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If we were to go by time invested and seniority, then here is the list > > that I would initially recommend. However, I agree with Chad that we > > Im not going to reply bullet by bullet because I think your message is very > well thought out and agree on nearly all points. > > I just want to reiterate though - that if the current owners make the new > board just them or not much bigger, not much will really change unless their > first action is to vote and start adding more members.
Well, like I said in that mail, I support something a bit broader, like the mailing list-based voting. > Scott pointed out that the list size is 84, so my first suggestion of adding > everyone is withdrawn. Why? As I said above, we just open the membership to anyone who is currently on the mailing list, but they'd have to "register" somehow, either by posting a list message requesting it or by getting a hold of the person we put in charge of gathering memberships. > But I think the initial board needs to be "fluffed" a little bit if the > situation is to actually change materially. Electing a board that consists > of the same people who are in defacto control won't change things much. Not like it was that broken to begin with :-P but, yeah the fluffing is a good idea in any case, especially if what you said about people not agreeing on the license is true. > I'd suggest we put out a poll to ask who is interested. That list is > compiled and decided on. Its my guess that the list would not be over a > dozen people, if even that large. IF so - its my suggestion that the best > thing to do would be just accept those in faith that anyone interested > enough to stay on the list and reply should be granted initial access. From > that point on though closed as you say and only entry by vote. Exactly. > > Any objections to at least polling and seeing who is interested and > collecting those names? Non bininding this point - just to see how big the > interested list would even be. Not at all. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > SharpOS-Developers mailing list > SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers > -- fury long name: William Lahti handle :: fury freenode :: xfury blog :: http://xfurious.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
