> with it (from a GPL compatible license). That's really the only > restriction I think you're concerned about. It would explain why the
That's the major one, there might be others (would need to dig) > LGPL seems to be an acceptable choice in your book. As for the "LGPL > code becomes GPL code thing", No that is not the case. It is _not_ > viral, especially in this case. If you link non free-software to GPLed Ok - so if I have GPL and LGPL. And the LGPL links to GPL - how can I link to LGPL without being restricted by GPL? Otherwise all I have to do to link to GPL is write a dummy GGPL wrapper and link to it.. That's my concern. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
